Skip to content
Pre-Launch · Filing seed · Series A — Q4 2026

History · Clearing houses of the modern market

Two hundred and thirty-four years of the same pattern.

The history of clearing is not the history of clever technology. It is the history of asset classes outgrowing the bilateral trust that once settled them, and institutions forming to take on the counterparty risk that had nowhere else to go. From 1792 to 2026, the pattern has not changed. The asset class has.
Earliest entry
Buttonwood · 1792
Entries
9 institutions
Geography
US · UK · Global
Latest entry
Wavestar · 2026

Why this page exists

If you build market infrastructure, you study the market infrastructure that came before you.

Every clearing house in the modern market was built in response to a specific failure or a specific scaling pain. The failures rhyme. So do the solutions. We have studied each of these institutions not because we are mimicking them, but because the lessons they learned at cost — structural lessons about novation, margin, default funds, operational resilience — are the same lessons we intend to avoid paying for twice.
The history of finance is the history of people learning, slowly and at enormous cost, that the cheapest way to settle a market is with a neutral third party who guarantees the trade.
Wavestar Research·History of Clearing, reading note

Timeline

Nine institutions, one pattern.

  1. 17 May 1792Complete

    Buttonwood Agreement — the precursor to the NYSE

    Twenty-four brokers sign an agreement under a buttonwood tree at 68 Wall Street. The agreement sets a fixed commission and restricts trading to signatories — the first move toward a formal market venue. Clearing is still bilateral and physical.
  2. 1888Complete

    London Clearing House (LCH) — founded at the Royal Exchange

    The world's oldest surviving clearing house is constituted to clear commodity futures. Margin is introduced as a prudential tool. LCH later becomes the canonical CCP for interest-rate swaps — the institution Dodd-Frank would point at four decades later when it mandated central clearing for OTC derivatives.
  3. 1898Complete

    Chicago Mercantile Exchange — futures clearing as a service

    The Chicago Butter and Egg Board reorganises into the CME. Standardised contracts, marked-to-market daily. The CME Clearing House introduces the default-fund waterfall model that every modern CCP — including Wavestar's ORCH — still uses. The operational discipline, more than the product innovation, is why CME is still here.
  4. 1919Complete

    Chicago Mercantile Exchange Clearing Corporation

    CME's clearing function is separated from the exchange and formally capitalised. This is the canonical structural split — venue and clearing house are legally distinct, even when common-owned. The same structure is our template: Market (venue) and ORCH (clearing) are independently chartered, independently auditable, and independently wind-downable.
  5. 1968Complete

    The US securities paperwork crisis

    NYSE trading volume exceeds the physical settlement capacity of the member firms. Offices drown in unsettled certificates. Exchanges close on Wednesdays for months at a time. The crisis is the direct catalyst for the creation of DTCC — proof that bilateral settlement does not fail gradually. It fails at the point where volume exceeds the operational envelope, and then all at once.
  6. 1973Complete

    DTCC (then NSCC + DTC) — US securities clearing and settlement

    The National Securities Clearing Corporation is chartered in response to the paperwork crisis. In parallel, the Depository Trust Company is formed to immobilise share certificates. Multilateral netting reduces daily settlement obligations by 98%+. This is the canonical reference for the registry model — one share, one record, many claimants.
  7. 1973Complete

    SWIFT — interbank messaging across borders

    Founded in Brussels by 239 banks across fifteen countries, SWIFT is explicitly not a settlement system. It is an addressing and messaging layer. Forty-plus years later, SWIFT still routes the majority of cross-border payments — proving that an identity and message standard can be more durable than any of the settlement rails that use it. This is the conceptual model for did:orbit:.
  8. 1973Complete

    OCC — the Options Clearing Corporation

    Founded the same year the Chicago Board Options Exchange opens, OCC is chartered to guarantee every exchange-listed options contract in the United States. The member-margin discipline that OCC invented — risk-based margin scaled to the portfolio, not the position — is the template for clearing any derivative on an orbital underlying.
  9. 1999Complete

    DTCC merger — NSCC and DTC combine

    The two institutions that had cleared and settled US securities in parallel for twenty-six years merge into a single holding company. The merger consolidates member relationships, netting, custody, and corporate-action processing under one roof. This is the institutional maturity curve: first a venue, then a clearing house, then a registry — eventually, one company.
  10. 2026In progress

    Wavestar — the clearing, settlement, and truth layer for orbit

    Wyoming LLC incorporated. First regulatory track (FinCEN MSB) filed within months of incorporation. The four preconditions for an orbital clearing house have flipped. The institutional pattern that DTCC, CME, LCH, SWIFT, and OCC established on Earth is being extended — one asset class, four modules, one registry — into space.

What each of them teaches

The lessons that carry forward.

  • 01

    From DTCC: the registry is the moat

    DTCC is not valued for its settlement engine. It is valued for being the canonical record of who owns what. Venue competition comes and goes; the registry compounds. Wavestar's did:orbit: namespace is the same structural bet.
  • 02

    From CME: daily mark-to-market is not optional

    Every modern CCP marks positions to market daily and collects variation margin. This is what keeps a default at Tuesday's close from becoming an institutional failure on Wednesday morning. ORCH's CCP novation model inherits this discipline in full.
  • 03

    From LCH: the default waterfall is the product

    The graduated waterfall — initial margin, defaulter pays, member default fund, CCP skin-in-the-game, mutualised assessments — is what turns a bilateral counterparty risk into a systemic-grade instrument. We adopt LCH's waterfall structure as the baseline.
  • 04

    From SWIFT: the messaging standard outlasts the rail

    SWIFT has survived five generations of payment systems because it is the addressing layer, not the settlement layer. did:orbit: is positioned the same way. It will outlast any particular clearing engine, including ours.
  • 05

    From OCC: portfolio-margin risk calculations

    OCC's STANS system computes margin on the full portfolio, not position by position. For orbital derivatives — where correlated constellations and bundled resource rights will be common — portfolio-margin logic is not a feature. It is a requirement.
  • 06

    From the 1968 paperwork crisis: volume breaks bilaterally, all at once

    The mode of failure of a bilaterally-settled market is not graceful. It is catastrophic. The institutions that matter are the ones that were built during the ramp, before the break. That is the window we are in for orbit.

The difference

What Wavestar does that is not a direct copy.

We are not rebuilding DTCC for satellites. We are taking the institutional pattern — neutral CCP, margin discipline, default waterfall, append-only registry, standards-based messaging — and re-implementing it for a set of assets whose delivery mechanics are different. Fuel that has to be physically transferred between spacecraft is not a bond. A downlink minute is not an option. A hosted-payload slot is closer to a commercial real-estate lease than to a futures contract.

The settlement primitive has to match the physics. That is the piece of the stack that is genuinely new — and the piece the team is spending most of its time on.

Everything else — the legal entity, the regulatory path, the rulebook, the committee structure, the audit discipline — we are lifting, deliberately and unapologetically, from institutions that have been doing it for a hundred years. The innovation budget is spent on the parts that require it. The rest is borrowed, and we are proud of that.

The institutions that last are the ones that understand which parts of them should be boring.
Wavestar Research·On institutional design

Read further

The thesis behind why this is the moment.

If the history of clearing is the frame, the thesis is the picture. Four preconditions that were not true in 2023 are true now. Read the argument.